1983 Audi Quattro

Your chance to introduce yourself and your vehicle
Post Reply
User avatar
AndreyB
Site Admin
Posts: 14727
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
Location: Jersey City
Github Username: rusefillc
Slack: Andrey B

1983 Audi Quattro

Post by AndreyB »

That's a LH-Jetronic is it? What do we know about EFI conversions of these engines - are there any kids to make the conversion simpler?

https://github.com/rusefi/rusefi/wiki/Jetronic-Conversion
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Very limited telepathic abilities - please post logs & tunes where appropriate - http://rusefi.com/s/questions

Always looking for C/C++/Java/PHP developers! Please help us see https://rusefi.com/s/howtocontribute
mck1117
running engine in first post
running engine in first post
Posts: 1501
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2017 2:05 am
Location: Seattle-ish

Re: 1983 Audi Quattro

Post by mck1117 »

No, that's K-Jetronic. LH-Jetronic = airmass hotwire. K-jetronic = mechanical MAF (!) that actuates valves directly that control fuel flow.
SmartInCar
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2020 4:39 pm
Location: Rostov-na-Donu

Re: 1983 Audi Quattro

Post by SmartInCar »

Привет!
Парни, у меня есть наработки по таким машинам.

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
AndreyB
Site Admin
Posts: 14727
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
Location: Jersey City
Github Username: rusefillc
Slack: Andrey B

Re: 1983 Audi Quattro

Post by AndreyB »

Very limited telepathic abilities - please post logs & tunes where appropriate - http://rusefi.com/s/questions

Always looking for C/C++/Java/PHP developers! Please help us see https://rusefi.com/s/howtocontribute
mck1117
running engine in first post
running engine in first post
Posts: 1501
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2017 2:05 am
Location: Seattle-ish

Re: 1983 Audi Quattro

Post by mck1117 »

User avatar
AndreyB
Site Admin
Posts: 14727
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
Location: Jersey City
Github Username: rusefillc
Slack: Andrey B

Re: 1983 Audi Quattro

Post by AndreyB »

This fancy vehicle has one or two 035905381a in stock form.

Stock injectors are like this http://www.sjmautotechnik.com/trouble_shooting/injector.html
image.png
Original constant flow injectors seems to be larger than modern injectors so the injector seat seems to have less material comparing with the custom replacement. 034133555A
image.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Very limited telepathic abilities - please post logs & tunes where appropriate - http://rusefi.com/s/questions

Always looking for C/C++/Java/PHP developers! Please help us see https://rusefi.com/s/howtocontribute
bill
Posts: 220
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2020 1:44 pm
Location: DC usa

Re: 1983 Audi Quattro

Post by bill »

SAABs had the same mechanical bosch fuel injection setup... in the late 70's early 80's
User avatar
AndreyB
Site Admin
Posts: 14727
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
Location: Jersey City
Github Username: rusefillc
Slack: Andrey B

Re: 1983 Audi Quattro

Post by AndreyB »

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Very limited telepathic abilities - please post logs & tunes where appropriate - http://rusefi.com/s/questions

Always looking for C/C++/Java/PHP developers! Please help us see https://rusefi.com/s/howtocontribute
User avatar
AndreyB
Site Admin
Posts: 14727
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
Location: Jersey City
Github Username: rusefillc
Slack: Andrey B

Re: 1983 Audi Quattro

Post by AndreyB »

Some pics "before" condition
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Very limited telepathic abilities - please post logs & tunes where appropriate - http://rusefi.com/s/questions

Always looking for C/C++/Java/PHP developers! Please help us see https://rusefi.com/s/howtocontribute
puff
contributor
contributor
Posts: 2963
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 11:28 am
Location: Moskau

Re: 1983 Audi Quattro

Post by puff »

this might be too subjective, but I had driven three audi with atmosperic 5-cyl engines, which were basically similar: one was 2.0 (44) with k-jet, and the other two were 2.3 ex-ke-III-jet (c4) converted to electronic injection. no turbo. from my experience I would say, 2.0 had performed better: it was revving faster, it provided same power under load (despite smaller volume), and probably had better fuel efficiency. this could be attributed to poor tunes of the later two cars. but more likely, these were the benefits of continuos fuel injection with all the regulation done by fuel pressure.

PS during my years at the university we had a course of physics (just genereal overview of how research in physics affected computer science). Besides electronics and photonics, the same logics can be implemented with pneumatics. There I learned about the Russian jet fighter that was stolen by the test pilot who decided to escape to Japan. Japanese engineers obviosly were perplexed to find no electronic parts at all, with all the aircraft units being driven mechanically by compressed air.
Post Reply