Page 1 of 1
1983 Audi Quattro
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2021 2:39 am
by AndreyB
That's a LH-Jetronic is it? What do we know about EFI conversions of these engines - are there any kids to make the conversion simpler?
https://github.com/rusefi/rusefi/wiki/Jetronic-Conversion
Re: 1983 Audi Quattro
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2021 2:42 am
by mck1117
No, that's K-Jetronic. LH-Jetronic = airmass hotwire. K-jetronic = mechanical MAF (!) that actuates valves directly that control fuel flow.
Re: 1983 Audi Quattro
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2021 4:37 pm
by SmartInCar
Re: 1983 Audi Quattro
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2021 6:46 pm
by AndreyB
Re: 1983 Audi Quattro
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2021 7:20 pm
by mck1117
Re: 1983 Audi Quattro
Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2021 2:38 pm
by AndreyB
This fancy vehicle has one or two 035905381a in stock form.
Stock injectors are like this
http://www.sjmautotechnik.com/trouble_shooting/injector.html image.png
Original constant flow injectors seems to be larger than modern injectors so the injector seat seems to have less material comparing with the custom replacement. 034133555A
image.png
Re: 1983 Audi Quattro
Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2021 3:09 pm
by bill
SAABs had the same mechanical bosch fuel injection setup... in the late 70's early 80's
Re: 1983 Audi Quattro
Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2021 3:23 pm
by AndreyB
Re: 1983 Audi Quattro
Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2021 3:07 am
by AndreyB
Some pics "before" condition
Re: 1983 Audi Quattro
Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2021 11:06 am
by puff
this might be too subjective, but I had driven three audi with atmosperic 5-cyl engines, which were basically similar: one was 2.0 (44) with k-jet, and the other two were 2.3 ex-ke-III-jet (c4) converted to electronic injection. no turbo. from my experience I would say, 2.0 had performed better: it was revving faster, it provided same power under load (despite smaller volume), and probably had better fuel efficiency. this could be attributed to poor tunes of the later two cars. but more likely, these were the benefits of continuos fuel injection with all the regulation done by fuel pressure.
PS during my years at the university we had a course of physics (just genereal overview of how research in physics affected computer science). Besides electronics and photonics, the same logics can be implemented with pneumatics. There I learned about the Russian jet fighter that was stolen by the test pilot who decided to escape to Japan. Japanese engineers obviosly were perplexed to find no electronic parts at all, with all the aircraft units being driven mechanically by compressed air.