Search found 95 matches
- Wed Nov 01, 2017 9:52 pm
- Forum: Misc
- Topic: Rusefi on MEG1.1 - anyone interrested?
- Replies: 16
- Views: 13202
Re: Rusefi on MEG1.1 - anyone interrested?
Hi, today i realized one thing, now im have almost 75% of the original ecu pins figured out/reverse engineered the purposes. Instead of making a new PCB, easier would be to swap the original MCU. It is a SAK SAK-C167CR-LM. (TQFP 144pins 0.65pitch, pinout in attachment) ST had a 10F27x series of chip...
- Wed Sep 27, 2017 5:41 am
- Forum: Misc
- Topic: Rusefi on MEG1.1 - anyone interrested?
- Replies: 16
- Views: 13202
Re: Rusefi on MEG1.1 - anyone interrested?
Hi everybody. I was a bit busy, but i am making progress on this project. In a short time i will post here my progress.
- Mon Jul 03, 2017 8:23 pm
- Forum: Misc
- Topic: Rusefi on MEG1.1 - anyone interrested?
- Replies: 16
- Views: 13202
Re: Rusefi on MEG1.1 - anyone interrested?
Hi, printing on the terminal wich i use for workshop information has printing locked only to tiff, because of license. It will not print to PDFs, even the redirection does not work. So if you wait a day i will manually convert it to PDFs and rotate it.
- Sun Jul 02, 2017 12:43 pm
- Forum: Misc
- Topic: Rusefi on MEG1.1 - anyone interrested?
- Replies: 16
- Views: 13202
Re: Rusefi on MEG1.1 - anyone interrested?
In the wiring diags archive there are tiff files. The first page of the tiffs are abbreviations and component listings, on following pages are schematics. The tiffs are multipage, so multiple pages in one file. I uploaded only the outline for now. In next days i will upload partially drawn schematic...
- Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:40 am
- Forum: Misc
- Topic: Rusefi on MEG1.1 - anyone interrested?
- Replies: 16
- Views: 13202
Re: Rusefi on MEG1.1 - anyone interrested?
Here are files from the wiring diagrams CJ920 on this ECU is routed to following ECU connector pins: The ics on the board marking: B57914 - 8x1 analog MUX 74HCT4351 with latch B57965 - 74HC14D B57566 - 74HCT32D? A1 - EV1 A2 - PIN48 EUVB catalytic converter switch valve A3 - EV2 A4 - EV3 A5 - PIN89 T...
- Wed Jun 28, 2017 8:54 pm
- Forum: Misc
- Topic: Rusefi on MEG1.1 - anyone interrested?
- Replies: 16
- Views: 13202
Re: Rusefi on MEG1.1 - anyone interrested?
Here are hires scans of the MEG ECU, just to make a picture of the original circuitry. Connectors are desoldered also the CJ911 and 30057 are desoldered.
MEGhiresscan.rar - 87.0 MB
In short time ill upload wirings and other materials.
MEGhiresscan.rar - 87.0 MB
In short time ill upload wirings and other materials.
- Tue Jun 27, 2017 9:34 pm
- Forum: Misc
- Topic: Rusefi on MEG1.1 - anyone interrested?
- Replies: 16
- Views: 13202
Re: Rusefi on MEG1.1 - anyone interrested?
I have schematics of the car, this is not a problem,also in my free time im trying to reverse the MEG ECU schematics,. Dash is CAN driven, it has an manual gearbox but it is controlled with two DC motors. Both motors have qadrature encoders. One is for clutch and the second is for gear selecting. Th...
- Tue Jun 27, 2017 10:17 am
- Forum: Misc
- Topic: Rusefi on MEG1.1 - anyone interrested?
- Replies: 16
- Views: 13202
Rusefi on MEG1.1 - anyone interrested?
Hi everybody, i am currently verry happy running rusefi on my Smart Roadster. But i want to integrate the rusefi in the original MEG1.1 casing and maintain all the functionality that the MEG has. But for one it is too much work. Is anyone interrested on helping with this project. When finished it co...
- Tue May 02, 2017 11:53 am
- Forum: Dev: Software
- Topic: ISO 9141-2 Diagnostics
- Replies: 18
- Views: 22517
Re: ISO 9141-2 Diagnostics
Many older cars do have only K line, or even when they have CAN, it is only used for instruments panel/internal backplane and can or can not output all internal variables. In K line you have a "standardized" PID set, what every or lets say nearly every engine must output, when requested. I...
- Tue May 02, 2017 10:35 am
- Forum: Dev: Software
- Topic: ISO 9141-2 Diagnostics
- Replies: 18
- Views: 22517
Re: ISO 9141-2 Diagnostics
One interresting thing to support 9141 is that it could act as a "reader" from the stock ECU to "clone" the original ignition and injection maps and use it as a stock tuning base for your car and engine. I think it would be pretty simple to implement eg.: Lets say we switch rusef...
- Thu Apr 20, 2017 9:28 pm
- Forum: Dev: Hardware
- Topic: GPS support / logging
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2743
Re: GPS support / logging
I will test it, when the boards will be made. I have now I2C pins free, i will integrate 9DOF too. Hopefully sometimes this module will be supported to make some really profesional logs with acceleration etc...
- Thu Apr 20, 2017 6:00 pm
- Forum: Dev: Hardware
- Topic: GPS support / logging
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2743
GPS support / logging
Hello everybody.
I have almost ready for etching my final PCBs and i want to ask, if there is any working GPS support/logging for rusefi?
I have almost ready for etching my final PCBs and i want to ask, if there is any working GPS support/logging for rusefi?
- Wed Apr 19, 2017 6:28 am
- Forum: Dev: Hardware
- Topic: TPIC8101DW
- Replies: 11
- Views: 8049
Re: TPIC8101DW
Stay tuned. I am making steps forward as i will now have some "free" time to move forward with my car. Summer is near and the car must be driveable at summer.russian wrote:Please keep us posted on your progress! I would love for someone to step in and move this area forward.nighthunter wrote:Now it works.
- Tue Apr 18, 2017 4:27 pm
- Forum: Dev: Hardware
- Topic: TPIC8101DW
- Replies: 11
- Views: 8049
Re: TPIC8101DW
Please elaborate, what works exacly? Does frankenso schematics have issues? When i designed my board i looked into the TPIC8101 datasheet and all SPI lines and CS have pullups, but i have not read correctly that the INT/HOLD is internally pulled low. I did not placed a pullup for the INT/HOLD. It s...
- Tue Apr 18, 2017 4:05 pm
- Forum: Dev: Hardware
- Topic: TPIC8101DW
- Replies: 11
- Views: 8049
Re: TPIC8101DW
Problem is solved now. The INT/HOLD pin is not internally pulled high, but its pulled low! That was the failure. Now it works.
- Sun Apr 16, 2017 4:49 pm
- Forum: Dev: Hardware
- Topic: TPIC8101DW
- Replies: 11
- Views: 8049
Re: TPIC8101DW
Yes, that is what i thinking, something in input stage goes wrong. I will test it. I have the Int/hold inputmode as default inverted, and the CSPIN input mode also. Is not that the problem? The command enable tpic_advanced_mode toggles the internal ADC reading or STM analog input? So if i use enable...
- Sun Apr 16, 2017 4:41 pm
- Forum: Dev: Hardware
- Topic: TPIC8101DW
- Replies: 11
- Views: 8049
Re: TPIC8101DW
This is my output of hipinfo in console 2017-04-16 18_39: EngineState: confirmation_hipinfo:7 2017-04-16 18_39: EngineState: spi 1=No/2=Yes/3=Yes 2017-04-16 18_39: EngineState: enabled=Yes state=1 bore=87.50mm freq=7.79kHz PaSDO=3 2017-04-16 18_39: EngineState: band_index=43 gain 1.00/index=-1 outpu...
- Sun Apr 16, 2017 4:29 pm
- Forum: Dev: Hardware
- Topic: TPIC8101DW
- Replies: 11
- Views: 8049
TPIC8101DW
Hi,
today im trying to make the TPIC to work. Can somebody help me how to configure it in TS? I think the problem is there. What about the connection the connection is 1:1 as the frankenso .4 pcb. Im getting nothing out of the tpic, i am using signal generator 4Vpp 8kHz on input.
today im trying to make the TPIC to work. Can somebody help me how to configure it in TS? I think the problem is there. What about the connection the connection is 1:1 as the frankenso .4 pcb. Im getting nothing out of the tpic, i am using signal generator 4Vpp 8kHz on input.
- Sat Apr 15, 2017 9:33 am
- Forum: Dev: Hardware
- Topic: CJ910/CJ911
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6046
CJ910/CJ911
Hi everybody. I am continuing my project and my goal is to use as much as possible ICs from ecus i have here. I want to use the supply IC CJ910/911 used in bosch MEG1.0 /1.1s. I will then hopefully redesign the rusefi back to the original MEG casing. I already doing some reverse engineering on this ...
- Sun Apr 09, 2017 11:43 pm
- Forum: Dev: Hardware
- Topic: Current status of working STM32 chips
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4988
Current status of working STM32 chips
Hi, just to be sure on what STM 32Fxxx can be rusefi currently run, can somebody write down the list of proven chips with packages? I am asking, because i want to design my final rusefi board with some extensibility in mind, but im running out of pins. ie. STM32F407VGT6 - LQFP 100 (F4 discovery is w...
- Fri Apr 07, 2017 6:00 am
- Forum: You and your build
- Topic: Smart 452 Roadster with "Bigblock" Engine #33
- Replies: 40
- Views: 29404
Re: Smart 452 Roadster with "Bigblock" Engine #33
Ive compared the signal (output from LM1815) to the output on original ECU. (Inside there is CJ910/CJ911). At low rpms and deceleration 1-3 tooths were not identified.
- Thu Apr 06, 2017 6:03 pm
- Forum: Dev: Hardware
- Topic: DEAD DESIGN rusEfi own wide band controller board add-on using CJ125
- Replies: 364
- Views: 353323
Re: CJ125 board
Hi, are there any news about integrating wideband?
- Thu Apr 06, 2017 6:39 am
- Forum: You and your build
- Topic: Smart 452 Roadster with "Bigblock" Engine #33
- Replies: 40
- Views: 29404
Re: Smart 452 Roadster with "Bigblock" Engine #33
I have a 60/2 trigger wheel, i measured in with scope and compared with the output signal.
- Thu Apr 06, 2017 5:05 am
- Forum: You and your build
- Topic: Smart 452 Roadster with "Bigblock" Engine #33
- Replies: 40
- Views: 29404
Re: Smart 452 Roadster with "Bigblock" Engine #33
With LM1815 i have a lot of missdetections. It is very poorly designed. You must have very big signal in compare with noise for this IC, it is not differential.
- Mon Apr 03, 2017 9:26 pm
- Forum: You and your build
- Topic: Smart 452 Roadster with "Bigblock" Engine #33
- Replies: 40
- Views: 29404
Re: Smart 452 Roadster with "Bigblock" Engine #33
You might get a pinch better signal from your op-amp board if you put a weak 2.5V on one of the op-amp inputs. I think the 9926 has that on the negative input. AKA keeps your signal at about 2.5V instead of allowing the overall potential to wander near the op-amp rails. Sweet, is that a STM32 runni...
- Mon Apr 03, 2017 7:32 pm
- Forum: You and your build
- Topic: Smart 452 Roadster with "Bigblock" Engine #33
- Replies: 40
- Views: 29404
Re: Smart 452 Roadster with "Bigblock" Engine #33
Hi, ive minimized the rusefi board a little to fit an FISHER TUF94 32 100 enclosure. (with a "two floor" design). Now i only have to mod the top "logic" board to use "dualhead" configuration so a double pack of STM32s will be there. Stay tuned. Here is a little video of...
- Sat Mar 25, 2017 10:11 pm
- Forum: Dev: Hardware
- Topic: DEAD DESIGN rusEfi own wide band controller board add-on using CJ125
- Replies: 364
- Views: 353323
Re: CJ125 board
Are you using paypal? Ill make you some donation next week. This is a good project.Accepting patches and monetary donations
- Sat Mar 25, 2017 10:08 pm
- Forum: Dev: Hardware
- Topic: BTM112 Bluetooth
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2888
Re: BTM112 Bluetooth
Via the USB i have no problem with Burn Page 0 Failed. I had this problem sometimes on the original discovery board. In my PCB design i doubled all the blocking caps around the MCU and now i havent had this problem. So i would guess if it is not a power/transient problem? Next days i test tweaking t...
- Sat Mar 25, 2017 11:50 am
- Forum: Dev: Hardware
- Topic: BTM112 Bluetooth
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2888
BTM112 Bluetooth
Hi. Today i populated my board with a BTM-112 bluetooth. It works, but every time, when i Burn settings (close every dialog). It gives me timeout and i must reconnect. It seems that the settings are stored, but it is really painfull everytime i edit tables to reconnect. USB works OK. Is there a way ...
- Sat Mar 25, 2017 11:47 am
- Forum: Dev: Hardware
- Topic: DEAD DESIGN rusEfi own wide band controller board add-on using CJ125
- Replies: 364
- Views: 353323
Re: CJ125 board
Hi, a working CJ125 driver would be great. Now i am using the hardware/firmware from elektor 1/2012 but it seems to have slow response, so tuning is a little bit tricky.