Statistics: Posted by mpeski — Fri Apr 11, 2014 3:34 pm
Statistics: Posted by AndreyB — Fri Apr 11, 2014 3:25 pm
Statistics: Posted by mpeski — Fri Apr 11, 2014 3:19 pm
At some point I would need a native speaker to fix my broken English...So, for this particular sensor the most precise scheduling would be possible if we schedule coil charting as '85.6 degrees after the 600 degrees position sensor event', and spark firing as '10 degrees after the 690 position sensor event'. Considering current RPM, we calculate that '10 degress after' is 2.777ms, so we schedule spark firing at '2.777ms after the 690 position sensor event', thus combining trigger events with time-based offset.
Statistics: Posted by AndreyB — Fri Apr 11, 2014 2:32 pm
Statistics: Posted by AndreyB — Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:15 am
Statistics: Posted by mpeski — Fri Apr 11, 2014 10:21 am